Management vs. Leadership

You will often hear the words leadership and management used interchangeably, however, leadership and management actually refer to separate concepts. The reason for this confusion is because leaders often need to have management skills, and managers often need to have leadership skills. Wikipedia defines leadership as the “process of social influence in which one person can enlist the aid and support of others in the accomplishment of a common task.” It defines management as “the act of getting people together to accomplish desired goals and objectives.” What you need to understand is that the leader is followed, whereas the manager rules – this is the core difference of management vs. leadership.

The Manager Rules

Managers have formal power over the people who work for them, their subordinates. Their subordinates perform the tasks which the manager requests are done. The aim of the manager is to maximise the output of the team for which they are responsible, according to some constraints, usually a combination time, quality, and cost.

Because of this need to maximize output according to constraints, here are some characteristics you’ll find common to many managers:

  • Managers are good at planning: they need to plan projects, ensuring controls are in the right place, along with allocating resource and ensuring the work is performed with the minimum of waste (lowest cost).
  • Managers focus on the now: they are concerned with who is doing which tasks right now. Again, this can be directly attributed to the fact that managers are paid their salary to get things done (maximize output).

The Leader is Followed

Leadership is guiding a group towards achieving the best results. Leaders do not have formal power over followers. The followers are not subordinates and are following the leader of their own free will, in essence, because the leader makes them want to. However, in companies and organizations leaders will often have formal power in the form of subordinates because they are managers in addition to being leaders.

Because leadership is about guiding a group, here are some characteristics you’ll find common to many leaders:

  • Leaders have a people focus: leaders are focussed on people and how people can be influenced. This means that leaders are interested in relationships, inspiring others and even listening.
  • Leaders are about vision: a vision about the future and the change which is needed to get there.

Understanding Leadership and Management more Deeply

The table below highlights the difference between managers and leaders in terms to what they seek and how they operate to give you a deeper understanding of the differences between managers and leaders.

Leaders

Managers

Deal in and cope with change Deal in and cope with complexity
Become apparent Are appointed
Set direction Plan
Are strategic Are tactical
Determine if the battle should be fought in the first place Determine how the battle should be fought
Look towards the future (vision) Look to now (operational)
People orientation Goal orientation
Define the culture Instill the culture
Are followed Have formal authority
Are a seller Are a teller
Break the rules Make the rules
Concerned with what is right Concerned with being right
Think long-term Think short-term
Like to reach Like to act
Motivate and inspire Control and solve
Push for change Push for stability

Project Management, Program Management, and Leadership

Obviously program management leans more towards leadership than project management, but both project and program management have elements of both leadership and management within them. A project will not deliver without plans and someone overseeing its execution (management). Likewise, leadership of the team is needed – to inspire the team to want to deliver the best they can possibly deliver.

If you imagine a straight line running from 100% leadership at one end, to 100% management at the other end, then project management roughly lies at 70% management (30% leadership) and program management lies roughly at 70% leadership (30%management). This obviously depends on the type of project or program being managed but it should give you a working understanding of the differences between the two roles.

Conclusion

In this article we have covered the fact that managers rule people through formal authority, whereas leaders are followed by people of their own accord. Leadership and management are separate concepts but leaders often need management skills and managers leadership skills. We’ve also seen that project management leans more towards management than leadership, and program management more towards leadership vs. management.

1 comment
Bruce Lynn says 8 years ago

This piece is a nice distillation of Bennis’ work on the subject. My own perspective focuses more on the approaches to risk taking in decision making by executives where I think the distinction comes to the fore. Also, the description focuses on the outcome not the activity…

Leaders optimise upside opportunity, Managers minimise downside risk. Both together are needed in appropriate balance to optimise returns.

Comments are closed